Deprecated: Constant FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING is deprecated in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/plugins/wpseo-news/classes/meta-box.php on line 59

Deprecated: Return type of wpCloud\StatelessMedia\Sync\BackgroundSync::jsonSerialize() should either be compatible with JsonSerializable::jsonSerialize(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/plugins/wp-stateless/lib/classes/sync/class-background-sync.php on line 429

Deprecated: Return type of PostDecorator::jsonSerialize() should either be compatible with JsonSerializable::jsonSerialize(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/themes/exa-theme/core/common/PostDecorator.php on line 175

Deprecated: Constant FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING is deprecated in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/conditionals/third-party/elementor-edit-conditional.php on line 22

Deprecated: Constant FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING is deprecated in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/conditionals/third-party/elementor-edit-conditional.php on line 28

Deprecated: Constant FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING is deprecated in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/conditionals/third-party/elementor-edit-conditional.php on line 22

Deprecated: Constant FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING is deprecated in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/conditionals/third-party/elementor-edit-conditional.php on line 28

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-includes/rewrite.php on line 500

Warning: Attempt to read property "author_name" on string in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/themes/exa-theme/core/front/Seo.php on line 33
Cachan a Kylie haciendo una estafa con línea de maquillaje - BETA Exa FM
Warning: Attempt to read property "author_name" on null in /var/www/beta_exafm/wp-content/themes/exa-theme/core/front/Seo.php on line 129
Noticias

Cachan a Kylie haciendo una estafa con línea de maquillaje

No hay dí­a que no exista polémica con la familia Kardashian-Jenner.

 

via GIPHY

Seguramente todos conocen la famosa lí­nea de lipsticks de Kylie Jenner que lanzó hace unos meses aprovechando la expectativa de sus labios. Los famosos lipsticks causaron furor ante sus seguidoras y rompieron récords de venta al salir al mercado y agotarse en muy poco tiempo.

 
 

What color would you like to see next for @kyliecosmetics ?

Una foto publicada por King Kylie (@kyliejenner) el

¿Cuál es el problema ante todo esto? 

Una famosa youtuber “Stephanie Nicole” se ha dado cuenta en su canal de que las posteriores ediciones de los labiales de Kylie Cosmetics han variado tanto su formulación como su aspecto respecto a la primera edición de productos.
 

What color would you like to see next for @kyliecosmetics ?

Una foto publicada por King Kylie (@kyliejenner) el

Y no acaban ahí­ sus observaciones, ya que se ha dado cuenta de que ahora los productos son muy similares a los de la firma Colour Pop, tanto en textura como color; y, como se han encargado de señalar desde Buzfeed USA, ambas marcas son propiedad del mismo fabricante de cosméticos.

 

For those asking about my swatches. Here you go in natural light. The new is way more purple/pink

Una foto publicada por Stephanie Nicole (@sf_stef) el

Mientras los de Colour Pop se venden a poco más de seis dólares, los de Kylie cuadriplican el precio.

 

I’m going to try & make this my last post about these, & then move on. This is the original lip kit launch, the new formula/packaging & then ColourPop Ultra Matte UPDATED formula. In my opinion, it feels they changed manufacturing. To me, it feels the first batch was made elsewhere, then moved to Spatz. I have zero proof of that. Just my feeling. The only updated ones are the new shades not originally launched in the first 30 shades or so. So again, you can’t compare them if it’s the original shades, those have not yet been reformulated, according to ColourPop. I put a silver dot on my original, so I didn’t confuse them. You can see how much more messy/liquidy the new one is. Again, I should’ve covered it in the video, besides saying a few times some ingredients are in different order, I had figured since I’ve covered the order matters in a formula previously, that was known. The first 4 ingredients are the same, same order. That’s the bulk of the formula. Then silica is in the same order after. Again, it will SLIGHLTY change the wear, hardly though. Not enough to warrant $16 vs $40, for me anyways, it’s clearly your decision. It doesn’t change the fact, ColourPop manufactures those same exact ingredients for $6, while turning a profit for their business. So you’re not paying for better ingredients, you’re paying for the name, like with most brand names. While we hope it’s for better quality, it’s not always the case. If your “designer” lipstick makes you happy, that’s completely cool. You never need a reason to like anything â¤ï¸

Una foto publicada por Stephanie Nicole (@sf_stef) el

¿A caso Kylie nos ha estado engañando? Seguramente todos pensarán que es la euforia de comprar el lipstick de Kylie Jenner, pero por un precio tan alto y de la misma calidad que el Color pop
.
 
Kylie ahora si nos ha decepcionado completamente, esperemos que pronto aclare esta situación.
 
 
 Portada: Publimetro

Más noticias: